It depends on what you're concerned about. For HIV, the risk without CIM is nil, for example (and with is not much higher). There are other things you can catch - do a search here for OWO for much discussion.
Unsure if an escort agency is ok? Click here to visit Scamblog
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Article 23 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights says that everyone has the right to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work, and the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of their interests.
There is no 'except for sex workers' in human rights. Such rights are particularly important to oppressed and marginalised groups.
The burden of proof is not upon sex workers to justify this: it is upon those who seek to refuse fundamental human rights to attempt to justify their bigotry. Every time sex workers' humanity is denied, it encourages violence and discrimination against them.
I would have thought that if only offered oral without that business would be very dead?. Only because many ask if do oral without. Are there ladies who are kept busy offering oral without only?.
I was reading a gay mens magazine in the clinic waiting room today (..) and it said that the risk of getting HIV/AIDS from oral was 3% but you need to take into account how more often people would like oral etc...