See also the main SAAFE.info site for more Support And Advice For Escorts

Author Topic: The Digital Economy Bill  (Read 1893 times)

Dexi Delite

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 952
    • Dexi
The Digital Economy Bill
« on: 24 March 2017, 08:32:27 pm »
Has anyone seen this?  And what are your thoughts regarding it's possible impact on our websites and advertising?

If I'm not allowed to post this then please remove

http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2016-17/digitaleconomy.html


[link replaced with one more appropriate]
« Last Edit: 24 March 2017, 08:40:51 pm by amy »
My Blog
http://dexi-independentescort.blogspot.co.uk/?zx=d34b4a1502afc98d

amy

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,401
Re: The Digital Economy Bill
« Reply #1 on: 24 March 2017, 08:43:10 pm »
I've replaced the URL for the one containing the actual bill information rather than what I assume was a blog, or whatever. That way anybody interested can read it and form their own opinion assuming they (unlike me) have time :)

Dexi Delite

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 952
    • Dexi
Re: The Digital Economy Bill
« Reply #2 on: 26 March 2017, 09:02:33 am »
Thanks Amy. xx
My Blog
http://dexi-independentescort.blogspot.co.uk/?zx=d34b4a1502afc98d

Lushblossom

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,674
Re: The Digital Economy Bill
« Reply #3 on: 28 March 2017, 07:01:46 pm »
Is this likely to affect us?

Dexi Delite

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 952
    • Dexi
Re: The Digital Economy Bill
« Reply #4 on: 29 March 2017, 07:14:36 am »
Yes.  Any website that contains adult content, whether it's soft porn pictures or written content will be effected.  This doesn't just include porn sites, but could also include the likes of Amazon who sell erotic literature, Ebay, Google, Facebook/twitter (there is a plethora of pictures on there that the government may deem soft porn, not to mention some of the conversations that we adults have on there), Adult work, and many of the other sites that we ladies advertise on, companies that sell sex toys etc.

As we're part of the sex industry then no doubt we will be forced to bring in a verification systemon our own websites to prove that our viewers are over 18.

The government has yet to decide what they deem as adult content yet, but they are ignoring the opposition, and are trying to push the bill through, which could be a huge problem for many.  There is a petition by 38 Degrees asking for people to write to their MP (they even write out the email for you so you don't have to). Just search for the Digital Economy Bill by said group. (Moderators, apologies if I've broken any rules here, as I'm not sure if I am allowed to post up the link for this petition.  If so, then please modify.  Many thanks). 

Considering large companies like Tesco's and Talk Talk cannot even secure their own customers private information without getting hacked, what chance have the rest of us got.

My Blog
http://dexi-independentescort.blogspot.co.uk/?zx=d34b4a1502afc98d

VoluptuousCurves

  • Defender of Ratties
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,624
Re: The Digital Economy Bill
« Reply #5 on: 29 March 2017, 10:59:09 am »
I've just had a read through the relevant section of the proposed bill - for those interested, it's in "Part 3 ? Online pornography"

Immediate takeaways:
  • The proposals relate ONLY to video. There is no mention of still photos, webcam, or written erotica. 
  • There is quite a firm definition of what constitutes porn, which largely relies on whether the film would be given an 18 or 18R rating if assessed by the BBFC. The good old "that it was produced solely or principally for the purposes of sexual arousal" is trotted out. 
  • There is provision for an "Age Verification Regulator" to be funded by the government, which means that any website owners who provide pornography online would be required to provide some sort of evidence that they do make checks on the age of consumers. The method for doing that has been left completely open. 
  • The Regulator can fine someone who isn't making sufficient checks to a maximum of ?250k, OR 5% of the individual/business's  annual turnover.
OK so this is the most important bit:
The regulator only has powers over what is called a "relevant person"
The bill defines this as
Quote
(3) A ?relevant person? is?
(a) an internet service provider, or
(b) a person who the age-verification regulator believes to be involved, or
to have been involved, in making pornographic material available on
the internet on a commercial basis to persons in the United Kingdom.

So - if you are showing nude pics on your website for free, this Bill won't affect you (in its current form - it's possible there might be more amendments.)
If you are making movie clips and selling them via AW or Clips4Sale, this Bill won't affect you as it is the host website's responsibility to do the age checks. AW already does this, I know for certain, not sure about other sites.

If you sell movie clips via your own website, then you would be responsible for doing age checks and this Bill would affect you. (It's possible a simple solution such as only selling content via a credit card would be sufficient, but at this time the Bill doesn't specify how checks should be made.)
And me, I am not a mess, I am a wilderness, yes
The undiscovered continent for you to undress

Dexi Delite

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 952
    • Dexi
Re: The Digital Economy Bill
« Reply #6 on: 29 March 2017, 07:16:29 pm »
Most of the Bill does seem to apply to videos.  However, this is the bit that I find disconcertingly ambiguous:

?classification   certificate?   has   the   same   meaning   as   in   the   Video Recordings Act 1984 (see section 7 of that Act);
?material? means?
(a)
a  series  of  visual  images  shown  as  a  moving  picture,  with  or without sound;
(b)a still image or series of still images, with or without sound;

I fear that once/if this gets passed then there will be, (undoubtedly, given our government's ability to fuck people over) 'mission creep' (like the 'anti-terror Bill) into other areas of the porn/adult industry.  I think this needs to be addressed at this stage - and not wait until it is too late.
My Blog
http://dexi-independentescort.blogspot.co.uk/?zx=d34b4a1502afc98d

Lushblossom

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,674
Re: The Digital Economy Bill
« Reply #7 on: 30 March 2017, 10:05:24 am »
I very briefly watched the Parliament channel last night and they were aiming to get all ISP's to have adult settings turned to OFF by DEFAULT and if you wanted them ON you had to contact the ISP direct.

This was so children do not see so much pornography online so easily at home etc.

VoluptuousCurves

  • Defender of Ratties
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,624
Re: The Digital Economy Bill
« Reply #8 on: 30 March 2017, 10:10:50 am »
I very briefly watched the Parliament channel last night and they were aiming to get all ISP's to have adult settings turned to OFF by DEFAULT and if you wanted them ON you had to contact the ISP direct.

This was so children do not see so much pornography online so easily at home etc.

Several ISPs are already do that and I think most of the mobile networks do.
And me, I am not a mess, I am a wilderness, yes
The undiscovered continent for you to undress

Kay

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,535
Re: The Digital Economy Bill
« Reply #9 on: 30 March 2017, 01:37:00 pm »
Yep, Sky (re)activated their broadband Shield last week, and I had to log on to choose to see 18+ content.
"There is no sin except stupidity" - Oscar Wilde

amy

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,401
Re: The Digital Economy Bill
« Reply #10 on: 31 March 2017, 01:01:47 am »
Several ISPs are already do that and I think most of the mobile networks do.

And so they have for years. Here's a previous thread http://www.saafe.info/main/index.php?topic=16359.0 :)