Do many escorts actually offer BB?

[SuperCheese]

As well as a lot of the other ridiculous time wasting, I often get asked for bareback. It's not something I offer, but is it actually offered by many escorts? 

[English Green]

Some obviously must do it as they advertise it and its been known some escorts have BB there regular clients but how many i would not know.

[SuperCheese]

Ah, I don't think I've seen it advertised! But all of this pestering and saying they'd pay extra is making me wonder.

[Justine]

I am sure you know but AW has a search facility and men can find hundreds of sps offering bb, not counting those who don't advertise it but do it.

[mm_reading]

same as justine I see quite a lot of it advertised on AW - well maybe not a lot but definitely a significant amount & get a lot of requests from guys who "only want BB with those who don't advertise it" who have a fair amount of feedback (not saying that they definitely accepted the bb request just that some escorts do offer it for extra but don't advertise it). Also escort of the day on AW is usually offering bb too

[SuperCheese]

I didn't realise how you could search like that, 37 girls in Wales alone. No wonder I get pestered for it!

[Lillys0]

Yes they do like at RBs on adultwork as well you get loads of guys asking for bareback asking for only girls who don't advertise BB. Because some girls might offer it under the table some guys will ask , I always block them and if they try in a booking they get thrown out .

[amy]

Like any other legal service, some people offer unprotected sex of varying kinds and others don't but the weird demonisation of people offering unprotected penetration as opposed to unprotected oral means that it's more likely to be done on the sly and not advertised. I would guess this is why punters sometimes think it's worth asking because it's something that they might have been offered before without it being public knowledge.

Since this demonisation is such that it's unlikely anybody here would post to say they offer unprotected vaginal/anal sex there isn't really any way anybody can answer the question - what other people do is their business, and I would instead be concentrating on ways to reduce the annoying enquiries that are actually affecting me .

[SuperCheese]

I wouldn't demonise someone for offering bb, I was just curious, as it's something that I get asked for a lot. It doesn't seem to matter if I state 100 times I don't do it, I still get asked. To be honest, I wouldn't block a client who has unprotected sex with another wg either, but he would still be wrapping it up.

[ana30]

They actually made it illegal in Germany (with the new laws) and any sex worker advertising BB in Germany can get arrested now.

[amy]

They actually made it illegal in Germany (with the new laws) and any sex worker advertising BB in Germany can get arrested now.

Yes, because telling adults what sort of sex they're allowed to have always works, even if there was any way of enforcing the law .

So now anybody who does offer outlawed services will feel less able to be honest with healthcare providers in the event that they're concerned about symptoms, not to mention the black market that will inevitably spring up and be impossible to monitor. Don't forget that the exact same two people could meet in a supermarket or at a bus stop and have the exact same unprotected sex with each other entirely within the law as long as no money changes hands (because obviously a virus or bacteria knows the difference and will only infect those paying/being paid).

If the above post is accurate and punters are not facing legal action for soliciting unprotected sex too (so all it's all the dirty prossie's fault) then it's even more of a sorry mess than I thought it was. But none of that has anything to do with the OPs question. Everybody gets asked occasionally, even me, but if it's a frequent thing than it might be worth havjng a rethink of your ad wording to make sure it's clear but not OTT .

[sweetmilf]

Since this demonisation is such that it's unlikely anybody here would post to say they offer unprotected vaginal/anal sex there isn't really any way anybody can answer the question - what other people do is their business, and I would instead be concentrating on ways to reduce the annoying enquiries that are actually affecting me .

This OT's question does pop up from time to time.  As for "on the sly", meaning "informally", not advertised as such -  I'm pretty sure there are other variants, too.  I agree that the term, demonisation is probably very accurate, used by escorts against other escorts.   People do as they please with their body, be it a whole-male fist fisting or otherwise.  I doubt this industry is as regulated as people would have liked. It's not.  I don't know enough about this new German legislation.  Maybe, there are unwanted abortions amongst vulnerable service providers, increased infection rate/ concern for incurable STIs, protecting vulnerable women, who knows?   I also agree that I have not seen a single post by escorts, who would do it only with their longstanding regulars whom she "gets on" with to keep these regulars.  I wouldn't particularly call it this is "on the sly".  She is probably forced into it over time covertly as she's afraid of losing the incomes if she wouldn't consent.

I have very few regs - thankfully, they don't ask any risky stuff, if he did, it would have really signalled the end.  But I have had quite a few repeat men, who expected it at some point, or even a year later, and moved on, rejected.  There are condom rippers.   I had one with one of the long-term regs whom I was itching to get rid of.   

[amy]

This OT's question does pop up from time to time.  As for "on the sly", meaning "informally", not advertised as such -  I'm pretty sure there are other variants, too.  I agree that the term, demonisation is probably very accurate, used by escorts against other escorts.   People do as they please with their body, be it a whole-male fist fisting or otherwise.  I doubt this industry is as regulated as people would have liked. It's not.  I don't know enough about this new German legislation.  Maybe, there are unwanted abortions amongst vulnerable service providers, increased infection rate/ concern for incurable STIs, protecting vulnerable women, who knows?   I also agree that I have not seen a single post by escorts, who would do it only with their longstanding regulars whom she "gets on" with to keep these regulars.  I wouldn't particularly call it this is "on the sly".  She is probably forced into it over time covertly as she's afraid of losing the incomes if she wouldn't consent.

I have very few regs - thankfully, they don't ask any risky stuff, if he did, it would have really signalled the end.  But I have had quite a few repeat men, who expected it at some point, or even a year later, and moved on, rejected.  There are condom rippers.   I had one with one of the long-term regs whom I was itching to get rid of.   

I don't think that anybody who values their autonomy and privacy wants this industry regulated at all in the sense of imposing laws and restrictions that treat sex workers differently to other workers, which is why sex worker groups, academics who have done proper research among sex workers and the support organisations who actually listen to us support decriminalisation and not legalisation (which comes with state interference as with the German laws, although that's nothing to do with this thread).

Unwanted pregnancy, STIs and all the other difficult circumstances mentioned are not exclusive to sex work, and unless you're going to outlaw unprotected sex between everybody just in case, they're not going to go away. Making something illegal doesn't deter people who are already criminals so will make no difference to anybody who is already being exploited or forced into providing services they don't want to - it'll just make them harder to find and help.

As for independents who do bareback occasionally and/or with trusted regulars, what the post above basically says is that because these women are doing something you would never do, they are unable to make decisions for themselves so they must be 'forced'? Seriously?

[Kay]

I actually think there's an interesting discussion to be had about BB, but it usually descends into pearl-clutching hysteria. I, personally, do feel OWO is less risky in terms of the overall transmission of STIs because it's less likely to involve syphilis, HIV, or genital herpes and warts.

My main issue with escorts who routinely offer BB is that even if they go for a full STI screen every week, they're still more likely to catch something and thus pass it on.
And re. clients, bug chasers are certainly a worry. Plus them not going for screening.

[Jessiegirl]

I have known some girls who never advertised it but did offer it to certain regulars.